Game. What even is it. We see the term Game banded around by everybody. Those ridiculous American accounts with their condescending sigh, “just learn game”, they preach to their bots.
Just learn science.
Just learn art.
Just learn The Thing.
I still to this day find the concept and description of Game to be poorly defined and thus impossible to discuss in any worthwhile detail. It’s a co-opted noun with no meaning. But let’s try define it, anyway.
Game is a nonsense umbrella term for the process that a man follows to adopt a competitive advantage to promote greater success in the dating market. Insider trading it is not. Breaking into the office and stealing the Glengarry Leads? Not so, either.
I look at the descriptors “game” and “daygame” as hindrances. Too many men associate strictly with notions of facsimile cold approach and inflating their value.
Where “game” isn’t needed
Or, What makes a man successful with women?
- Being good looking
- Being confident
- Being in the same age cohort (5 years)
- Being charasmatic
Have these 4 things and you probably already sleep with enough cute girls to keep you happy. If you don’t, it’s a simple fix, believe me.
Generally speaking, a guy in his 20s with a bit of nous will be able to get enough fanny in drunken student filled clubs 7 nights a week. Translate this onto the street via cold approach and the same situation is readily reflected. Young attractive women gravitate toward, date and fuck, young normal men (as any British, Ukranian or Polish city will show). They do not walk around with some beefed-up AlfaChad (as the American red-pill garbage accounts dictate). The distribution curve of girls in their 20s and their dating choices doesn’t lie.
Where “game” is needed
Or, what makes a less attractive or older man successful with women.
Older men, less attractive or less charasmatic men must rely on a slightly different tact: They need to have some intrinsic “value” coupled with a strategy to enhance their charm and charisma. So many guys are simply faking their value: lying about age, their career, where they live, why they are “there” in that city in the first place (yes, guilty of this at times). Sure, you can rugpull a girl and pretend to be that smart, ambitious older man: ply her with older man fantasies, the intelligent and smart businessman, the writer or the millionaire. But when you don’t even own your own fucking iron, or washing machine, or your own cutlery? How on earth do you expect the mirage of value to last beyond the evening? She wakes up next day knowing this. She walks away. And back into the Ponzi Scheme you go.
Be sure that to be relevant in the market it is not enough to learn canned openers. You must work on your offering. Get more successful. Get more interesting. Get more attractive. Get more charasmatic.
Far more useful for a man to take the more developmental approach over faking the value, or adopting the Bait and Switch philosophy. Better to be more holistic and build real value over time.
So. Forget the ridiculously ludicrous and unspecified notion of simply “learning game”. Focus on the specifics of developing your personality and lifestyle.
- Enhance your charisma.
- Understand how to elicit key female emotional states.
The men I listen to (and there are few of them) are the ones with the patience and creativity to build a sexual rapport with a woman outside of their normal sexual demographic range. Men in their 20s pulling horny, lonely tourists only in town for the weekend? They have zero to teach me.
In simple terms you are selling yourself via developed social skills after you have used a basic mechanism to aquire contact details from a girl in the real world.
London DG has been for too long centered on and associated with fast escalation with pre-selected girls, before they know it sex has happened. This leads to two outcomes, either the girl see through the lie, or goes about her day happy that she got her holiday fuck (in most cases).
Are either of these outcomes desirable? Sure. If that’s what makes you happy. Just don’t tell me you have anything to show me.
I find the term game/daygame so outdated now. It does not capture the process in any regard. Sure, use your nous to spot the lonely, ambling tourist whose after a one-and-done. But don’t kid yourself that you’re doing anything fucking remotely special. If she didn’t fuck you, she was inevitably going to fuck some bloke from Tinder that night.
Ask yourself why so many lays from so many DG guys are opportunistic. Game, in this regard, is simply the means to identify tells in girls (often tourists) in high volume (tourist areas) and get in there first. Shooting fish in a barrel, it may be. Requiring some decent escalation methods? Sure. But indicative of a nuanced skillset/seduction reportoire? I beg to differ.
A more developed strategy involves building your personality, your lifestyle and your offering. It will instill in you the basic modules required to develop, excite and hold the interest of females as well as the ability to turn long leads with genuinely hotter women into dates and sex. This requires a more systematic approach to yourself. It takes time. But it offers way more reward than squalor fucking your way to a load of +1s on Twitter.
BroodingSea, Kraków July 2022

Leave a reply to Crazy Cock Cancel reply